Gendered or neutral? Considering the language of HCI


Adam Bradley, Cayley MacArthur, Mark Hancock, and Sheelagh Carpendale. In Proc. GI, pp. 163-170, 2015.


Publication and Related Materials


pdf (3.01 MB)


Abstract

In this paper, we present a Mechanical Turk study that explores how the most common words that have been used to refer to people in recent HCI literature are received by non-experts. The top five CHI 2014 people words are: user, participant, person, designer, and researcher. We asked participants to think about one of these words for ten seconds and then to draw an image of it. After the drawing was done we asked simple demographic questions about both the participant and the created image. Our results show that while generally our participants did perceive most of these words as predominately male, there were two notable exceptions. Women appear to perceive the terms “person” and “participant” as gender neutral. That is, they were just as likely to draw a person or a participant as male or female. So while these two words are not exactly gender neutral in that men largely perceived them as male, at least women did not appear to feel excluded by these terms. We offer an increased understanding of the perception of HCI’s people words and discuss the challenges this poses to our community in striving toward gender inclusiveness.


Bibtex entry

@INPROCEEDINGS { Bradley:2015:Users,
    AUTHOR = { Adam Bradley and Cayley MacArthur and Mark Hancock and Sheelagh Carpendale },
    TITLE = { Gendered or Neutral? Considering the Language of {HCI} },
    BOOKTITLE = { Proc. GI },
    SERIES = { GI '15 },
    YEAR = { 2015 },
    LOCATION = { Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada },
    PAGES = { 163--170 },
    PUBLISHER = { Canadian Information Processing Society },
    ADDRESS = { Toronto, Ont., Canada, Canada },
    KEYWORDS = { gender issues in HCI, language, people, users },
}